Step by Step to Implement AI-Based Threat Intelligence in Manufacturing

Learn how to implement AI-based threat intelligence in manufacturing to detect risks and strengthen industrial cybersecurity.

Abnormal AI

October 27, 2025


Manufacturing operations depend on industrial control systems, IoT devices, and operational technology to drive productivity. These technologies have dramatically expanded the cyberattack surface, creating vulnerabilities that criminals actively exploit.

The 2024 IBM Cost of a Data Breach report reveals manufacturing breaches now average $5.56 million in total costs, an 18% surge from 2023. This escalation reflects two critical factors: industrial control systems store increasingly valuable intellectual property, and even minimal production downtime triggers cascading financial losses.

Threat Landscapes Grow More Complex Every Day

Manufacturing organizations confront escalating cybersecurity challenges as threat actors increasingly target industrial systems with sophisticated, AI-powered attack methods. The convergence of operational and information technology systems has fundamentally expanded the attack surface while creating vulnerabilities that traditional security approaches cannot protect.

Current ransomware attacks demonstrate unprecedented sophistication, with adversaries developing specialized capabilities for manufacturing environments. Also, the critical gaps in OT network monitoring leave industrial systems vulnerable to attacks causing production shutdowns costing millions daily.

Manufacturing organizations need AI-based threat intelligence systems specifically designed for industrial environments that understand unique behavioral patterns, OT/IT convergence complexities, and specific attack vectors targeting manufacturing operations. That said, here are five steps to implement AI-based threat intelligence in manufacturing:

1. Understanding Your Manufacturing-Specific Threat Landscape

Manufacturing organizations face unique threats that target industrial environments through attack vectors not seen in traditional enterprise environments. Manufacturing threat landscapes encompass three critical attack categories that traditional threat detection often overlooks:

  • Supply chain attacks specifically target the complex vendor ecosystems that manufacturing organizations depend on, exploiting interconnected supplier relationships to gain legitimate access credentials and spread compromise across multiple organizations simultaneously.

  • Operational technology targeting represents ransomware designed for production shutdown, unlike IT system compromises that focus on data encryption. OT attacks can result in physical damage to equipment, safety system failures, and complete production shutdowns costing millions per day.

  • Industrial espionage and insider threats target high-value intellectual property including proprietary manufacturing processes, product designs, and supply chain relationships through sophisticated long-term campaigns.

2. Mapping Your Manufacturing-Specific Attack Surface

Comprehensive attack surface assessment provides the foundation for effective industrial cybersecurity defense strategies. Manufacturing attack surfaces include unique industrial components and communication protocols not found in traditional IT environments.

Manufacturing attack surface assessment requires evaluation across five critical domains:

  • Network Architecture Assessment: Focuses on OT/IT convergence points where corporate networks interface with industrial control systems, often lacking adequate segmentation and creating pathways for lateral movement

  • Endpoint System Analysis: Encompasses both traditional IT devices and specialized industrial equipment including PLCs, DCS, and safety systems that often operate legacy systems with known vulnerabilities

  • Industrial Protocol Assessment: Examines communication standards specific to manufacturing including Modbus, DNP3, EtherNet/IP, and PROFINET that often lack built-in security features

  • Human Factors Evaluation: Addresses the hierarchical nature of manufacturing operations and authority granted to engineering and management personnel who become targets for social engineering attacks

  • Physical Infrastructure Review: Encompasses physical access controls to industrial systems, maintenance procedures, and contractor access management

The comprehensive attack surface mapping enables prioritized protection of assets most critical to production operations and regulatory compliance.

3. Choosing Industrial-Grade AI Threat Intelligence Platforms

Manufacturing organizations require AI-powered platforms that integrate with both IT and OT environments while meeting specialized requirements for industrial cybersecurity frameworks and compliance standards.

Tbe platform selection requires understanding fundamental differences between AI threat intelligence systems designed for traditional enterprise environments versus those built for manufacturing complexity.

Also, according to NIST's Cybersecurity Framework 2.0, manufacturing organizations must ensure selected platforms include OT overlays that provide tailored security control baselines.

The essential platform capabilities include:

  • Behavioral analysis specifically trained on industrial communication patterns

  • Automated threat hunting that understands normal OT operational cycles

  • Native support for industrial protocols

  • Compliance with industrial security standards and security guidelines

4. Building Manufacturing-Aware AI Detection Models

Manufacturing organizations must train AI systems to recognize industry-specific threat indicators including:

  • Engineering Workstation Access Anomalies: Monitor irregular logins to engineering systems outside maintenance windows, which often signal compromised credentials or insider threats targeting sensitive design specifications.

  • Suspicious CAD and Database File Movements: Track atypical transfers of engineering blueprints or production databases during off-hours, indicating potential data exfiltration of technical documentation.

  • Cross-Network Communication Irregularities: Detect unusual traffic between OT and IT environments that reveals lateral movement as attackers pivot toward industrial control systems.

  • Control System Parameter Manipulation: Identify unexpected changes to process variables or control logic that signal attempts to disrupt production or cause operational failures.

Effective manufacturing AI detection employs deep learning neural networks specifically designed for time-series analysis of industrial process data, ensemble learning methodologies combining rule-based expert systems with machine learning algorithms, and unsupervised learning algorithms including isolation forests for detecting zero-day attacks.

5. Implementing Production-Aware Automated Response

With models trained, manufacturing organizations need automated response systems understanding production contexts and safety requirements before taking protective actions. Security teams struggle with alert overload from systems unable to distinguish operational variations from genuine threats, causing delayed response times and analyst burnout.

Effective automated response requires production-centric approaches fundamentally different from traditional IT security methods. Therefore, manufacturing response must integrate with PLCs, DCS, and safety instrumented systems, while manufacturing execution systems enable understanding current production states. Production context awareness considers manufacturing states when determining appropriate actions. Properly configured automation achieves dramatically improved response times.

Moving Forward with AI-Driven Threat Intelligence

Implementing AI-driven threat intelligence in manufacturing environments requires a systematic approach that addresses the unique complexities of industrial cybersecurity. Organizations benefit most when they begin with comprehensive threat landscape assessment, understanding the specific attack vectors that target manufacturing operations including supply chain infiltration, OT system compromises, and industrial espionage.

Successful implementations follow a structured progression: mapping manufacturing-specific attack surfaces that include OT/IT convergence points, selecting platforms designed for industrial environments with proper compliance frameworks, building AI models trained on manufacturing behavioral patterns, and implementing automated response systems that consider production safety requirements.

The manufacturing-specific approach proves critical because generic cybersecurity solutions cannot adequately protect industrial environments. Organizations that invest in understanding their unique operational technology requirements position themselves to defend against increasingly sophisticated AI-powered cyber threats while maintaining operational continuity and regulatory compliance.

Where Abnormal Fits In

Abnormal addresses the unique challenges manufacturing organizations face by employing behavioral AI that baselines normal organizational behavior to detect deviations traditional threat intelligence systems miss. Abnormal recognizes anomalies even in ongoing conversations, enabling immediate detection and remediation of threats that legacy systems overlook.

The behavioral AI approach specifically benefits manufacturing environments through continuous analysis of communication patterns and organizational behavior. This methodology proves particularly effective for detecting sophisticated supply chain attacks, insider threats, and social engineering attempts that target manufacturing organizations' complex vendor relationships and high-value intellectual property.

Overall, manufacturing organizations implementing Abnormal behavioral AI gain protection against advanced attacks that evolve beyond traditional threat signatures while reducing the operational burden on security teams.

Avery Dennison: Automating Security While Protecting Innovation

Fortune 500 materials science leader Avery Dennison, with 36,000+ employees across 50 countries, needed to protect intellectual property and vendor relationships while maintaining 100% production uptime.

Abnormal's API-based platform transformed their Google Workspace security:

  • 40 hours saved weekly through automated investigation and remediation

  • 358 BEC attacks blocked in 90 days

  • 330 high-risk vendors identified

  • $200K vendor payment saved from fraud attempt

VP and Information Security Officer Jeremy Smith noted: "Abnormal automated our manual processes and provided more efficacy at the same time. That allows us to focus our security resources in other places."

Ready to implement AI-based threat intelligence? Learn how Abnormal helps manufacturing companies detect email threats while supporting broader cybersecurity objectives or book a demo today!

Related Posts

Blog Thumbnail
Detecting Stealthy Account Takeover Campaigns with Federated Intelligence

November 7, 2025

See Abnormal in Action

Get a Demo

Get the Latest Email Security Insights

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive updates on the latest attacks and new trends in the email threat landscape.

Discover How It All Works

See How Abnormal AI Protects Humans