NOC vs SOC: Responsibilities and How They Complement Each Other
Understand NOC vs SOC responsibilities and how they complement each other to improve monitoring, incident response, and overall security.
September 9, 2025
Network reliability and cybersecurity create interdependent risks that cripple organizational continuity when managed separately. Most organizations operate their Network Operations Center (NOC) and Security Operations Center (SOC) as isolated teams, each responding to distinct alert streams while critical threats exploit coordination gaps between them.
Modern threats don't respect organizational boundaries, a DDoS attack degrading network performance while masking data exfiltration requires both operational and security expertise to contain effectively. This article explores how unified processes transform overlapping responsibilities into operational strength through coordinated defense systems.
Understanding the NOC Role
A Network Operations Center keeps your network running by monitoring performance and fixing outages before they disrupt business operations. Acting as the command hub for IT operations, the NOC maximizes availability and throughput across every router, switch, server, and link throughout the enterprise infrastructure.
The NOC functions as a 24/7 nerve center focused on operational health rather than malicious activity. Network engineers work inside dashboards for traffic analytics, configuration managers, and remote-access tools, relying on continuous monitoring platforms that surface live telemetry. Their core responsibilities encompass network monitoring to track latency and bandwidth, incident resolution through triaging tickets, change management for deploying configuration updates, and server maintenance including backups and firmware patching.
Understanding the SOC Role
Security Operations Centers protect organizations by monitoring, investigating, and responding to cyber threats around the clock. Unlike network operations teams focusing on natural outages or device failures, the SOC zeroes in on human-driven disruptions: phishing campaigns, credential theft, ransomware, and insider misuse.
SOC teams execute four tightly linked workflows forming the backbone of enterprise cybersecurity. Threat detection and intelligence sifts through logs, network traffic, and endpoint telemetry to flag anomalies indicating malicious activity.
Additionally, incident response contains, eradicates, and recovers from confirmed attacks using streamlined procedures. Vulnerability management scans for weaknesses and drives remediation before adversaries exploit them. Forensic analysis reconstructs events after breaches to pinpoint root causes.
Where NOC and SOC Responsibilities Overlap
Network operations and security teams intersect in three critical workflows creating both challenges and opportunities for collaboration. These include:
Shared Incident Response
During service disruptions, network engineers isolate faulty segments while security analysts hunt for malicious triggers, both relying on identical packet captures, log files, and device metrics. This shared telemetry extends to routine monitoring where infrastructure teams track bandwidth graphs for congestion and security teams scan those same flows for data exfiltration.
Configuration Management Risks
Simple configuration changes illustrate the overlap, a firewall rule restoring application performance could open new attack paths, requiring review from both perspectives. Both centers ensure business continuity after major incidents where disaster recovery succeeds only when operational scripts align with breach containment procedures.
Real-World Attack Scenarios
DDoS attacks degrade throughput while operations teams mitigate traffic and security analysts confirm the flood isn't masking data exfiltration.Ransomware encrypts file shares as security teams contain malware and infrastructure teams restore segmented backups. Modern attacks blur performance and security boundaries, making parallel playbooks inefficient.
How NOC and SOC Teams Complement Each Other
Network operations and security teams working from shared telemetry and unified playbooks detect threats faster, reduce downtime, and eliminate security gaps that attackers routinely exploit.
Operational insight feeds security context in powerful ways. Infrastructure engineers monitor bandwidth spikes, latency shifts, and device health continuously, these performance metrics serve as early indicators whether from faulty hardware or coordinated attacks. Streaming this data to security teams gives threat hunters critical context to distinguish between benign network issues and malicious activity.
Security analysts enhance operational alerts with threat intelligence that transforms raw metrics into actionable intelligence. Shared dashboards and integrated ticketing systems prevent duplicate investigations and ensure immediate ownership of every anomaly. Organizations implementing this integration report faster incident resolution and reduced false positives across both teams.
Challenges in NOC and SOC Coordination
Poor coordination between network operations and security teams creates critical blind spots that attackers exploit daily through three primary obstacles.
Organizational Silos and Language Barriers
Traditional structures isolate network engineers and security analysts in separate departments, often across different buildings or continents. Each team operates with distinct vocabularies, network engineers discussing "high latency" reference performance metrics, while security analysts use the same term to describe attack patterns. These language barriers delay critical escalations when seconds determine containment success.
Conflicting Priorities and Metrics
Operations teams measure success through uptime percentages, while security teams focus on threat containment speed. During incident response, infrastructure teams prioritize service restoration while security teams demand forensic preservation. Without shared escalation frameworks, these conflicting approaches create "ticket wars" extending resolution timelines.
Fragmented Technology Stacks
Disparate monitoring dashboards, SIEM platforms, and ticketing systems scatter incident data across isolated silos. Security analysts cannot access network performance baselines and network engineers lack visibility into threat intelligence feeds. Legacy tools designed for on-premises environments cannot provide unified visibility across hybrid infrastructures, creating dangerous blind spots.
Best Practices for Integrating NOC and SOC
Successful integration between network operations and security teams requires three foundational elements transforming competing priorities into collaborative strength.
Establish Joint Processes and Training
Creating joint incident runbooks defines clear escalation paths and ownership boundaries for every scenario. Regular tabletop exercises transform theoretical procedures into practiced responses, developing coordination that becomes instinctive during real incident response. Cross-training programs build mutual understanding where network engineers learning basic threat hunting can spot suspicious traffic patterns, while security analysts understanding routing protocols make better containment decisions that won't disrupt critical services.
Deploy Unified Technology Platforms
Integrated platforms routing alerts to both teams simultaneously ensure everyone works from the same information, eliminating dangerous information silos. Unified dashboards provide real-time network and security metrics in one consolidated view, reducing alert fatigue by correlating related events.
This shared visibility cuts investigation time and prevents communication gaps that extend incident duration when teams wait for updates from each other. Integration with SIEM platforms ensures both teams have access to enriched threat intelligence data.
Secure Executive Sponsorship
Executive sponsorship provides organizational authority for sustainable integration, arbitrating competing priorities when network stability conflicts with security requirements. Leaders provide budget authority for technology investments neither team could justify independently.
Most critically, executives enforce collaborative metrics aligning both teams toward shared outcomes. Joint KPIs including mean time to resolve, percentage of automated responses, and overall uptime reward coordination over individual performance, creating lasting cultural change that survives personnel changes and organizational restructuring.
How Abnormal Supports NOC-SOC Integration
Abnormal's behavioral AI bridges the gap between network operations and security teams by providing a unified intelligence layer that both teams can leverage. This approach enables detection and response to sophisticated threats that exploit the coordination gaps between traditional NOC and SOC operations. Through API-based integration with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, Abnormal deploys without changing MX records or rerouting traffic.
Unified Behavioral Intelligence for Both Teams
Abnormal learns how your organization communicates—who talks to whom, when, and about what—then flags deviations in real time. Because the same enriched insight surfaces to both operations and security consoles, teams see a single, high-fidelity picture instead of competing alert streams. This shared context eliminates blind spots, accelerates decision-making, and turns infrastructure and security teams into one coordinated defense engine.
With every message and user action scored against a dynamic behavioral baseline, security teams review only high-confidence alerts instead of sifting through noise. The behavioral analysis helps analysts focus on relevant threats, reducing false positives and surfacing attacks that signature-based tools miss, such as unusual external email forwards or suspicious new vendor invoices.
The same behavioral models enrich operational alerts with context. When credential misuse or a compromised vendor account threatens availability, infrastructure teams get immediate context, affected endpoints, communication paths, and recommended containment steps, enabling action before performance degrades. Operations teams benefit from early warning indicators preventing disruptions before they cascade.
Pre-built SIEM and SOAR connectors push enriched events directly into existing workflows, enabling fully automated investigations or one-click containment. The platform integrates with major ticketing systems, ensuring both infrastructure and security teams receive the same enriched alert data in their preferred tools. Deployment requires no network architecture changes, allowing teams to start receiving behavioral intelligence within hours.
Ready to transform your NOC and SOC into a unified defense system? Request a personalized demo to see how behavioral AI can bridge the gap between your operational and security teams.
Related Posts
Get the Latest Email Security Insights
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive updates on the latest attacks and new trends in the email threat landscape.